Plumides, Romano, and Johnson, PC

Plumides, Romano, and Johnson, PC

  • FacebookFacebook
  • LinkedInLinkedIn
  • YoutubeYoutube
  • TwitterTwitter
  • Google My BusinessGoogle My Business
  • 704-333-9900
  • Home
  • Our Team
    • Gregory Plumides
    • Michael Romano
    • Richard B. Johnson
    • David M. Krusch
    • Clint Davis
    • Toni Primiano
    • Alan Krusch
    • In Memory, Edward S. (“Ted”) Shapack 1948 – 2023
    • Our Staff
    • Our History
  • Practice Areas
    • Family
      Law
    • Criminal Defense
    • Personal Injury
    • Workers Compensation
  • Education Library
    • Family Law FAQ
      • Child Support Calculator
    • Criminal Defense FAQ
    • Personal Injury FAQ
    • Workers Compensation FAQ
    • Video Center
  • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Contact

U.S. Supreme Court case tried concerns stops for suspected DUIs

May 19, 2014

The U.S. Supreme Court recently heard a decision that addressed how far police can go in enforcing laws aimed to reduce drunken driving. The decision will have ramifications concerning DUI arrests in North Carolina and across the country.

The case entitled Navarette v. California was a 5-4 decision where the majority ruled that police officers could stop a driver for suspected drunk driving based upon an anonymous call made to a 911 dispatcher. The majority decision was written by Justice Thomas. Justice Scalia, on the other hand, wrote a dissenting opinion where he referred to the court’s decision as “a freedom-destroying cocktail.”

When police arrested the individual in question there appeared to be no evidence that this person was driving erratically. The driver was nevertheless pulled over allegedly to find out whether he was intoxicated. Though he was apparently not intoxicated, he reportedly was transporting 30 pounds of marijuana. The arresting officers claim that they could smell the marijuana.

Police do require “reasonable suspicion” of criminal behavior before pulling them over in traffic stop cases. A tip is not in itself supposed to be defined as reasonable suspicion. The tip is supposed to be from a credible source. If the source is anonymous, it must have an “indicia of reliability.”

There was much that was unusual about this particular case and it will likely remain a controversial one. The caller may have provided his name to the 911 operator, but the wrong 911 operator was summoned by the prosecuting attorney. The case was then tried in the trial court as if an anonymous call had been made.

However much we may wish to think otherwise, DWI and DUI cases are complicated and deal with a large number of factors. Criminal defense attorneys are needed in these cases to make clear what options and rights individuals being charged with a DWI or DUI have.

Recent Posts

  • Remembering Edward (“Ted”) S. Shapack
  • Child custody decisions can be affected by living arrangements
  • Can a DWI Affect My Child Custody Case?
  • Workplace and Divorce
  • I Lost My License – How Am I Supposed to Get to Work?

Categories

  • Blog (29)
  • Child Custody (20)
  • Criminal Defense (26)
  • Divorce (58)
  • Domestic Violence (6)
  • Drug Charges (14)
  • Drunk Driving Charges (18)
  • Family Law (8)
  • Felonies (6)
  • Firm News (1)
  • High Asset Divorce (17)
  • Marriage – Pre-nup (8)
  • Traffic violation (2)

Archives

  • January 2023 (1)
  • August 2021 (14)
  • July 2021 (2)
  • June 2021 (2)
  • May 2021 (1)
  • April 2021 (11)
  • February 2019 (1)
  • December 2018 (1)
  • November 2018 (2)
  • October 2018 (2)
  • September 2018 (5)
  • August 2018 (5)
  • July 2018 (5)
  • June 2018 (9)
  • May 2018 (3)
  • April 2018 (6)
  • March 2018 (6)
  • February 2018 (5)
  • January 2018 (6)
  • December 2017 (5)
  • November 2017 (7)
  • October 2017 (4)
  • September 2017 (2)
  • August 2017 (5)
  • July 2017 (3)
  • June 2017 (4)
  • May 2017 (3)
  • April 2017 (3)
  • July 2015 (2)
  • June 2015 (2)
  • May 2015 (2)
  • April 2015 (2)
  • March 2015 (3)
  • February 2015 (2)
  • January 2015 (2)
  • December 2014 (3)
  • November 2014 (2)
  • October 2014 (2)
  • September 2014 (2)
  • August 2014 (2)
  • July 2014 (2)
  • June 2014 (2)
  • May 2014 (2)
  • April 2014 (2)
  • March 2014 (2)
  • February 2014 (2)
  • January 2014 (2)
  • December 2013 (1)

What our clients are saying

Mr. Romano is an amazing family law attorney.  He has been my attorney for over 5 years and I have never been disappointed.  His experience and expertise in Family law, in my opinion, supersedes all others in the field.  Mr. Romano and his team are very knowledgeable, thorough, professional, and personable. I highly recommend Mr. Romano and his team without reservations. If you're in need of a Family law attorney, Mr. Romano is your guy!
-Ivette C
You never know all the questions you should ask so it was a blessing that they listened and provided plenty of recommendations as well as assisted with claim, deeds etc. They know what to expect and provided a service without being pushy and will go at a pace you want and explain the laws so that you can understand all the legal speak.
-Paul S

CONTACT US

You deserve to have a skilled legal advocate on your side who will protect your best interests. We will do just that.

To schedule a consultation, please call our office in Charlotte at 704-333-9900, or contact us online. Plumides, Romano & Johnson

2115 Rexford Road, Suite 320 Charlotte NC 28211
704-333-9900
704-358-0536

 

charlotte-family-divorce-separation-alimony-childsupport-dui-dwi-defence-trial-attorneys

Plumides, Romano & Johnson, PC

Explore

  • Home
  • Our Team
  • Practice Areas
  • Contact Us

Resource

  • Education Library
  • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Sitemap

Follow

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Youtube
  • Twitter
  • Google My Business

Legal

  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy
704-333-9900
CONTACT US
2115 Rexford Road, Suite 320 Charlotte NC 28211

Child Support Calculator
x